Founding Partner
The strongest proof is objective evidence: the police crash report, statements from independent witnesses, photos and video from the scene, the damage to your motorcycle, and, when the facts are disputed, an accident reconstruction. That evidence matters even more in Maryland because the state follows contributory negligence, a rule that can bar an injured person from any recovery if that person’s carelessness helped cause the crash, even slightly. The other driver’s insurer knows the rule and will look for any fault it can pin on you. A Maryland motorcycle accident attorney can gather that evidence before it disappears.
How Insurers and Courts Decide Who Caused a Motorcycle Crash
Fault in a Maryland crash depends on negligence: which person failed to use ordinary care, and whether that failure caused the collision. The other driver’s insurance adjuster makes the first decision about fault when the company reviews your claim. If the claim goes to court, a judge or jury decides.
Both sides ask the same questions. Who had the right-of-way? Was anyone speeding, distracted, or impaired? Where was each vehicle in its lane? Could the driver see the motorcycle before turning or changing lanes?
Maryland’s traffic laws answer part of that, because they spell out what each person owes everyone else on the road. Two rules set out duties a driver owed you:
- Left turns. A driver turning left at an intersection, or into an alley or driveway, must yield to any vehicle coming from the opposite direction that is in the intersection or so close that it is an immediate danger. Maryland law defines a motorcycle as a motor vehicle, so an oncoming rider gets the same protection as an oncoming car.
- Your lane. On a road with clearly marked lanes, every motorcycle is entitled to the full use of a lane, and a driver may not drive in any way that takes that space from you. That rule does not cover motorcycles riding two abreast in one lane.
When the other driver broke one of these rules, the evidence in the next section is how you prove it.
The Evidence That Shows What Really Happened
Insurance adjusters weigh proof they can check. The evidence that proves a rider was not at fault includes:
- The police crash report. The officer’s diagram, the drivers’ statements, and any citation record what the officer found at the scene. If you left in an ambulance before giving a statement, check whether the report includes your account.
- Independent witnesses. An independent bystander has no reason to favor either driver. Get names and phone numbers at the scene, and have statements taken while memories are fresh.
- Photos and video. Photograph where the vehicles came to rest, skid marks, debris, lane markings, signs, and what the driver could see from the turn lane. Look for video from traffic cameras, nearby businesses, doorbell cameras, dashcams, and helmet cameras.
- Your motorcycle and gear. Scrapes, dents, and the point of impact show the angle of the collision. Do not repair, sell, or throw away the bike, your helmet, or your riding gear until someone has photographed and documented them.
- Accident reconstruction. A reconstruction expert uses scene measurements, vehicle damage, and video to calculate speed, timing, and sight lines. That analysis tests an insurer’s claim that you did something wrong.
- Medical records. Records that start with your first visit after the crash tie your injuries to the collision.
Security and doorbell cameras that record on a loop overwrite old footage, so video is the evidence to secure first. You or your attorney should send the owner a written request to preserve it right away. The lawsuit has a deadline too: Maryland gives most injury claims three years from the date the claim arises, unless another law sets a different period. A child hurt in a crash usually has until three years after turning 18 to file their own claim.
Some cases have shorter deadlines. A claim against the State of Maryland or a Maryland local government, such as after a crash with a government vehicle, usually requires a written notice or claim within one year of the injury, so check with an attorney as soon as possible to determine your deadline.
Why Maryland’s Contributory Negligence Rule Matters
Under contributory negligence, a rider whose carelessness helped cause the crash in any way can be barred from recovering anything, even when the driver carried most of the fault. The state’s highest court kept that rule in place in 2013, in Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia. In that case, a jury found the defendant negligent and found that the injured man’s carelessness also contributed to his injuries. Because of that second finding, he recovered nothing.
The rule gives the insurer a reason to examine every choice you made in the seconds before impact: your speed, your lane position, your following distance, and whether your headlight was on. Your evidence has to prove the driver caused the crash. In court, the driver must prove that your carelessness helped cause it, but that argument can reach a jury on fairly little evidence, so your proof should answer each claim.
Maryland courts recognize a few narrow exceptions, including one called last clear chance. It applies only when, after your mistake put you in danger, something new gave the driver a fresh opportunity to avoid the crash, the driver knew or should have known of the danger in time to avoid it, and the driver failed to take that opportunity. If the driver never had a chance to avoid the crash after your mistake, the exception does not help.
Insurer Arguments That Riders Can Answer
The other driver’s insurer can raise several arguments to shift blame onto you. Each one has an answer grounded in Maryland law or in the evidence:
- “You weren’t wearing a helmet.” Maryland requires riders to wear a helmet that meets state safety standards. But in an injury claim arising from a motorcycle’s operation, the law bars treating a missing helmet as evidence that you were careless. It cannot limit the insurer’s liability or reduce what you recover. At a trial over the crash, no party, witness, or lawyer may mention helmets at all, unless the injury is related to how a helmet was designed, made, supplied, or repaired.
- “You were lane splitting.” On a road with marked lanes, Maryland prohibits riding between lanes of traffic or between rows of vehicles, and passing in the same lane as the vehicle being passed. Police officers performing their official duties are exempt. If the insurer makes this claim, it will argue that the violation helped cause the crash. Video, witness accounts, and scrape marks on the road show where your bike actually was.
- “You were speeding.” Timestamped video, the distance between skid marks and the point of impact, and a reconstruction expert’s calculations test that claim with numbers.
- “I never saw the motorcycle.” The left-turn rule ties a driver’s duty to where the oncoming vehicle was. Photos of the sight line from the driver’s position show whether you were there to be seen.
The adjuster who raises these arguments works for the other driver’s insurance company. Before you give that company a recorded statement, talk with a lawyer about the questions it will ask.
How a Maryland Motorcycle Accident Attorney Can Help
After a crash, the driver’s insurer starts building a version of events that puts some of the blame on you. We build yours. Our team obtains the crash report, tracks down video before it is erased, and interviews witnesses. We look for the traffic rule the driver broke and prepare answers to the contributory negligence arguments an adjuster is likely to raise.
McGowan & Cecil, LLC has handled Maryland personal injury claims for people in Laurel and throughout the Baltimore-Washington area since 2001, backed by more than 120 years of combined legal experience. We also represent drivers and passengers hurt in Maryland car accidents. We assign at least one attorney and one paralegal to every case, and our support is 100% human, with no AI assistants. We charge no fee unless we recover compensation for you, and se habla español. Contact us for a free case evaluation.